Why Presidential System is Better Than Prime Ministerial One?

President Ramvaran Yadav has administered oath of office to 3 successive prime ministers in these 3 years of period. Yadav was also elected president at around the same time (only 2 months before) of election of Prachanda as prime minister in early 2065. Doesn’t this prove, presidential system is way more stable and better than parliamentary one?

Wrangle over which of the systems – presidential or prime ministerial – is better and should be adopted is just needless as President Yadav’s tenure shows – notwithstanding his so called ceremonial role – presidential system is need of the hour in Nepal which  has so long been witnessing unstable politics under the prime ministerial system.

So called worry over the possible presidential dictatorship has come from those who are for instability (in Nepal).

This is simple and obvious, an open- and- shut case, ain’t it?


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s